Verdicts & Settlements
News-Attorney Profile
Fees & Costs
The Catholic Cases
Contact Us

Martindale Hubbell
There is no guarantee of recovery in any case because each case has its own specific factual and legal circumstances. Each of the cases presented were resolved as a result of their specific factual and legal circumstances.

Attorney fees and case preparation expenses were deducted from each recovery, thereby reducing the amount actually received by the client.

Case: Medical Malpractice -
Crouch Estate

Settlement: $1.5 million

Associated Press

PADUCAH, Ky. - The estate of a Livingston County man has won a $1.5 million settlement from Lourdes Hospital and a Paducah physician.

The settlement cancels the trial of a malpractice suit against Dr. Joseph Curtsinger that was scheduled to begin today in U.S. District Court.

The suit arose when the estate of Billy Crouch of Smithland alleged that Curtsinger delayed an operation, allowing a fatal gangrene infection to develop. The plaintiffs also alleged that the hospital was negligent for issuing credentials to Curtsinger. Both denied wrongdoing.

Crouch's estate alleged that Curtsinger's battle at the same time with the hospital over a peer-review report had left the doctor distraught and that the hospital negligently left him on the staff.

The peer-review report on Curtsinger cleared him of any wrongdoing in another case, but a minority report in the files allegedly was critical of him.

Curtsinger sued the hospital alleging that it had allowed William McMurry, a Louisville attorney representing Crouch's estate, to review the report. The doctor had asked that he be allowed to see the critical report also, but his request was denied last November in McCracken Circuit Court. Curtsinger's lawyer, Mike Greene of Louisville, made a similar request of US District Judge Tom Russell, who was to hear the malpractice suit


Citing a Kentucky Supreme Court ruling last year that said hospital records could be released in malpractice cases, Russell ordered Lourdes in January to turn over most of Curtsinger's peer-review files to the plaintiffs.

However, he declined to release the critical document, saying it "had no relevance" in the case. He ordered the document sealed.